Part 1 of 2: In a notable and well-written opinion by Justice Cuéllar[1] for the court, the California Supreme Court recently reversed a Second District Court of Appeals decision holding the context of speech challenged by an anti-SLAPP motion is irrelevant to the motion’s analysis under California’s anti-SLAPP law, Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16[2]. Plaintiff FilmOn is a for-profit business. It …